presentation of the Z 650 RS 2023
We' ve been waiting a long time for a little sister for the Z 900 RS... Now it's here. The concept is now available in mid-size format, with the same recipe for success: a contemporary roadster, a retro toilet, and changes all round to make it a machine in its own right, not just a makeover. Clac, it's matched, it sparkles, it shows off its pride and joy, and it's called the Z 650 RS.
It 's going to be hard to fault it. The mimicry is very successful, allowing everyone to rediscover the great lines that are so appealing on the 900. The allure of the Z1, that slightly bourgeois look, a big round headlight, an egg-shaped tail, and a dashboard with dual needle gauges. As Axe would say, let the charm work.
Kawasaki has not (fortunately) adopted the semi-square design of the old-fashioned firecracker for its fuel tank. It, too, takes the shape of the Z 900 RS, with its indelible elegance and paunchy presence.
The wheels are also from the same lineage, with their multiple, slender spokes. A special mention for the green color, the only one with a gold coating on the rims, as on the Z 900 RS SE. A glamorous touch that goes down well!
It's a pity that the exhaust system retains its dirty look - we wouldn't have minded an "old-fashioned" silencer.
No surprises on the engine side. The parallel twin's performance remains unchanged: same displacement, same power (68 hp), same torque (6.5 mkg), same revs to reach maximum values. This will be an asset for almost all purchasers of this machine. The 649 cm3 is fun to ride, very usable on a daily basis, and strong without being frightening, making it an excellent companion on the road. For a little less time at each stage, as the fuel tank holds just 12 liters (3 less than the Z).
For the sake of a chat, let's take a step back in time and see if the Z 650 RS has recaptured some of the memories of the Z 650 of the 70s and 80s. The watts, yes; almost identical. But that's about it. The ancestor was powered by a 4-cylinder with 8 valves, carburettors, air cooling and weighed a fair amount.

Not at all. The riding position is much more relaxed, as befits a vintage-scented machine. With the handlebars raised and the seat at 820 mm (instead of 790), the rider finds himself in a more natural, less aggressive posture, leading to a ride that's less on the teeth. The grips are 50 mm higher and 30 mm further back.
The rear frame also takes on a different posture. It looks as if a press has pressed down hard on the second half to flatten it out. The whole stern becomes longer and truly old-school.
Virtually the same dynamic qualities can be found on the RS as on the Z. The tubular steel trellis frame, banana swingarm, 41 mm fork and shock absorber, as well as the brakes, are all transferred from one to the other. Only the discs change, losing their petal shape without altering their 300 mm diameter. Two pistons in each caliper to bite them, with ABS as a safeguard.
Brake anti-skid and fuel injection are just about all the electronics available for road use. The rest is to be found between the tachometer and rev counter. The small LCD unit first indicates the gear ratio engaged. This is followed by the fuel level, engine temperature, clock, trips and a number of other indications. A control on the handlebars lets you scroll through them. There's no showboating, no high-tech overkill, no smartphone link... but there is a USB port under the seat (optional) - not necessarily a practical place.
A rear-view mirror is made to see out the back... Kawasaki has combined the two to present its Z 650 RS. Let's forget the marketing approach and concentrate on what the bike really wants. To offer all the appeal of the Z 900 RS in a smaller format. To appeal to a wider range of riders. Especially since it can be downsized to A2. The styling is a success, the powertrain accessible to the widest possible audience, and the expected comfort a notch above that of the Z 650. With a much more affordable price than the big RS, its future should be bright.
M.B - Manufacturer's photos
Key facts Kawasaki Z 650 RS (2023) : What you need to know before you buy
Highlights
- The look of the 900 for less
- More comfort than the Z
Weak points
- Sacrifice of passenger handles
- Less autonomy
Prices
| Basic version | |
|---|---|
|
8,349€
|
Performance
- Max speed : approximately 200 km/h (124.30 mph)
- Average fuel consumption : 4.30 liters/100km (0.55 mpg)
-
Estimated range
: 279 km (173 miles)
Calculated range until tank is empty, not verified.
Specifications Kawasaki Z 650 RS 2023
- Chassis
- Frame : Tubular steel mesh
- Fuel capacity : 12 liters (3.17 US gallons)
- Seat height : 820 mm (32.28 in)
- Length : 2,065 mm (81.30 in)
- Width : 800 mm (31.50 in)
- Min height : 1,115 mm (43.90 in)
- Wheelbase : 1,405 mm (55.31 in)
- Weight when fully loaded : 187 kg (412 lb)
- Front axle
- Telehydraulic fork Ø 41 mm, Wheel travel : 125 mm (4.92 in)
- Braking 2 discs Ø 300 mm (11.81 in), 2-piston caliper
- Front tire : 120 / 70 - 17 → Order this type of tire
- Pressure : 2.25 bar
- Transmission
- 6 stage gearbox , manual
- Secondary by chain
- Rear axle
- Mono-damper, Wheel travel : 130 mm (5.12 in)
- Braking 1 disc Ø 220 mm (8.66 in), single-piston caliper
- Rear tire : 160 / 60 - 17 → Order this type of tire
- Pressure : 2.5 bar
- Motor
- two-cylinder online , 4 strokes
- Injection Ø 36 mm
- Cooling system : liquid
- 2 ACT
- 4 valves per cylinder
- 649 cc
- 68 ch (67.10 hp) to 8,000 rpm
- 6.50 mkg to 6,700 rpm
- Power-to-weight ratio : approximately 2.62 kg/ch
- Weight / torque ratio : approximately 27.07 kg/mkg
- Compression : 10.8 : 1
- CO² emissions: 107 g/km
- Standard equipment
- Brake assist : ABS de serie
- Practical information
Gallery
Used
Compare the Z 650 RS to its competitors
Price
Fuel consumption
Range
Torque
Power
Power-to-Weight ratio
Torque-to-Weight ratio
Speed
CO² emissions
FAQ Your frequently asked questions about the Z 650 RS 2023
- What is the power of the Z 650 RS 2023?
-
The Z 650 RS 2023 develops a power of 68 ch (67.10 hp)
- What is the torque of the Z 650 RS 2023?
-
The maximum torque of the Z 650 RS 2023 is 6.50 mkg to 6,700 rpm.
- What is the maximum speed of the Z 650 RS 2023?
-
The Z 650 RS 2023 is capable of reaching a top speed of approximately 200 km/h (124.30 mph) on the track.
- What is the weight of the Z 650 RS 2023?
-
The Z 650 RS 2023 has a a weight when fully loaded of 187 kg (412 lb).
- What is the fuel consumption of the Z 650 RS 2023?
-
Average fuel consumption is estimated at 4.30 l/100km (0.55 mpg) according to the WMTC cycle.
- QWhat is the seat height of the Z 650 RS 2023?
-
To ensure good accessibility, the Z 650 RS 2023 offers a minimum seat height of 820 mm (32.28 in).
- What is the price of the Z 650 RS 2023?
-
The price of the Z 650 RS 2023 is 8,349€ in France
News
-
Vroom GPS: The 100% free motorcycle Waze with no subscription required
-
How to Choose a Motocross Helmet?
-
Bose audio in Sena intercoms.
-
Triple XL size and a matte carbon finish for the HJC F100 helmet.
-
BMW is celebrating the 50th anniversary of the RS series.
-
Brembo launches its GP4-MotoGP caliper, the competition-grade component.
-
A breath of fresh air for the Yamaha R9 with SC-Project
-
How do you choose motorcycle gloves based on the season and your riding style?
-
Top Block specializes in the V-Strom 800DE and its protective gear.
-
The new motorcycle models of 2026 and the evolutions.






Bikers' reviews Leave a review - 24 reviews
In short, it's a great bike for getting started in the world of motorcycling, and why not keep it after my A2? Rating : 4/5 Respond to Nazario
However, acceleration is very linear, and some might say that it lacks de facto character, but for a young rider (me) this makes the bike very reassuring and predictable. If you want a relatively similar bike with a bit more oomph, check out the SV650 or XSR700. I think the neo-retro recipe is a success. Admittedly, the pot leaves something to be desired both visually and sonically (it's a far cry from the raucous sound of a Triumph or Royal), although once it's thrown high into the revs, the noise goes well with the speed! All in all, the bike's great (there's nothing objective about that), it goes fast enough, it brakes very well, it's pretty, the speedo and rev counter are very nice, it's comfortable thanks to the slightly soft seat, and the atypical aesthetics make it a bike that turns heads! Rating : 5/5 Respond to Vince
As for the engine, I love it! It's got what it takes to overtake big trucks with a flick of the handle, and it's also very easy to ride coolly. It's not a sports car at heart, but it's got what it takes to lose its license very quickly. Highway driving should be avoided, as it gets a little tiring above 140. The café racer bubble might be a good option. Cycle-wise, it's a bike. Superbly maneuverable and at ease in a series of bends. Passenger grips option compulsory. On the other hand, the original tires are very poor, especially on wet ground.
I also really like indicators like fuel consumption and the number of km remaining before pushing....
In short, a bike for everyday use with no problems, to be seen as it wears out. And gas to all and sundry! Rating : 5/5 Respond to jc de thizy
It's agile, very comfortable, with excellent torque, good brakes (ruined by overly soft suspension) and, with sport tires (the standard ones are useless), you can ride very fast without exceeding safety limits.
I really enjoy it every time I go for a ride.
In two years, I've covered 13,000 km and I think I'll easily finish the year with more than 20,000 km.
Weak points: the suspension mentioned above (I'd like to modify it to make it a little stiffer), the noise (the exhaust and the 180-degree parallel twin don't help), the slightly small fuel tank (with sporty riding, fuel consumption rises to 4.8-5.0 L/100 km, so a 12 L tank doesn't last long).
The rest of the bike is simply awesome. I'm convinced it will be highly sought after in the future. Rating : 4/5 Participate in the conversation
The exhaust on the Kawasaki is disgusting, what's that???! There are ways of improving it aesthetically... It can be a very nice bike, but at around €7,500. Once again, at the current price, I'll go to Triumph and buy a real bike with no plastic, impeccable finish, plenty of torque, and a price tag that decreases very little over time. Rating : 3/5 Respond to Boom
No range
For about 1700€ more
A 660 tuono makes me dream a little more. Rating : 3/5 Respond to Petrouchka
This Z650RS reminds me very pleasantly of its 1977 grandmother, on which I took my A3 driving test
Pleasant overall lines, displacement suited to my leisure use, but only in twin-cylinder mode..
I like the retro look of the round needle counters, except for the chrome outline, which reduces readability
I don't like the exhaust pipes, nor the imposing radiator
Nevertheless, worth a try. Quickly! Rating : 4/5 Respond to Denis N.
The only downside (but it's a recurrent one for most brands) is the choice of cheap plastic (meters, etc.) instead of chrome-plated steel, especially at this price
Despite everything, I think this will be my next bike. Rating : 5/5 Respond to Vava91
Okay, purists are going to raise their eyebrows over details, as usual and as with all motorcycles (for this one, it'll be the range, the exhaust and other minor trifles), but I'm sure we'll be seeing a lot of them on the roads next spring
If, of course, delivery times don't suffer too much from the current slump
For my part, it'll be a used bike (Honda CB650R or Triumph Trident 660). Rating : 4/5 Respond to Jeff2A
It's a pity on the er5s, as Kawa had some very nice aluminum scoops and a superb fuel filler cap
All thermal. Given the CO2 targets, will we be allowed to run them in a decade or so? Rating : 3/5 Respond to Alban 49
On the other hand, the estimated price is rather high compared to that of the direct competition, which offers superior features
But all in all, Kawasaki has succeeded in its gamble, and it's likely to be a big hit in terms of sales, given that price is not an issue for some people today
As for the future of internal combustion engines, there's still a lot to come in the next 10 years... Rating : 4/5 Participate in the conversation