Motorcycle specifications HondaCBR 500 R 2013 Five senses game
presentation of the CBR 500 R 2013
from initiation to confirmation, the CBR range has become a veritable school for sport bikes. Discover with the CBR 125, assert yourself with the 250, become a racer with the 600, go for the big time with the 1000. The CBR 500 R bridges the gap between road and track, cruising and speed, gym and sport. In the motorcycling galaxy, this CBR has a special role to play: it's the sporty representative of the A2 license.
it's not immediately obvious that this machine is the sister of the CB 500 N roadster and the CB 500 X trail bike. Yet all three share the same engine and chassis. Thanks to the magic of a good pencil sketch, a design very much inspired by the CBR 1000 RR and a full fairing, this CB has a very sporty look. Even the Y-spoke rims resemble those on the big hypersport. You either believe it or you like it, but it makes you want to. Track racing?
This will be the case in the 2013 Superbike championship, as this machine has been chosen for the young wolves of the European Junior Cup.
closer to home, will the CBR 500 R share the same fate as its distant ancestor in the CB 500 Cup? We'll have to wait and see, because although this devil-may-care machine smells like an arsehole, it's more than capable of playing a road bike's part. Witness its raised half handlebars, good passenger grips and a riding position that promises to be more pleasant than radical.
The CBR 500 doesn't need a crazy chassis to comply with the 35 Kw regulations. It makes do with a very conventional chassis, with a diamond-type steel frame, 41 mm forks, a commonplace, functional swingarm and a pro-Link rear monoshock. Braking is provided by a 320 mm petal disc at the front and a 240 mm disc at the rear; ABS is standard. The tires, 120/70 - 17 and 160/60 - 17, are as wide as those on a 1996 CBR 600 F.
you can be generous with the throttle. The twin's 47.5 hp won't bend the chassis. A reasonable amount of power, right at the limit of that allowed by the A2 license. The horsepower of the 471 cm3 will take you anywhere, except at high speed, with just the right amount of mid-range punch. The pistons on this block are similar in shape to those on the 1000 RR, and identical in diameter to those on the 600 RR. With its square dimensions (67 x 66.8 mm), the engine-makers were not looking for hysteria at high revs, but for more responsive behavior in the middle of the rev counter. A sign of the times, this mill promises to be particularly frugal, with Honda giving it a fuel consumption figure of 3.7 liters per 100 km.
technically ideally positioned between the 2 and a half and the 600, the CBR 500 R is also ideally positioned in terms of pricing. It is sufficiently more expensive than its sibling not to overshadow it (although...) and half the price of the 600 RR, aimed at an already experienced and assertive public. Oriented towards economy, driving pleasure and fun, this 500 adds the sparkle of a youthful silhouette to the common platform from which it springs. It smells of sport, stimulates the eye, whispers of a ride, doesn't shy away from a taste of competition, and doesn't forget to welcome your hands for a promising touch.
M.B - Manufacturer's photos
Share
Key facts Honda CBR 500 R (2013) : What you need to know before you buy
Highlights
- Sport line
- Ideal A2 power
- Driving position
- Consumption
Weak points
- Not enough watts for sport
Prices
| Basic version | |
|---|---|
 France |
5,900€
|
Performance
- Max speed : approximately 180 km/h (111.80 mph)
- Average fuel consumption : 3.70 liters/100km (0.64 mpg)
-
Estimated range
: 424 km (263 miles)
Calculated range until tank is empty, not verified.
History
Specifications Honda CBR 500 R 2013
- Chassis
- Frame : in Diamond steel
- Fuel capacity : 15.70 liters (4.15 US gallons)
- Seat height : 790 mm (31.10 in)
- Length : 2,075 mm (81.69 in)
- Width : 740 mm (29.13 in)
- Min height : 1,145 mm (45.08 in)
- Wheelbase : 1,410 mm (55.51 in)
- Weight when fully loaded : 194 kg (428 lb)
- Front axle
- Telehydraulic fork Ø 41 mm, Wheel travel : 120 mm (4.72 in)
- Braking 1 disc Ø 320 mm (12.6 in), 2-piston caliper
- Front tire : 120 / 70 - 17 → Order this type of tire
- Pressure : 2.5 bar
- Transmission
- 6 stage gearbox
- Secondary by chain
- Rear axle
- Mono-damper
- Braking 1 disc Ø 240 mm (9.45 in), single-piston caliper
- Rear tire : 160 / 60 - 17 → Order this type of tire
- Pressure : 2.9 bar
- Motor
- two-cylinder online , 4 strokes
- Injection
- Cooling system : liquid
- 2 ACT
- 4 valves per cylinder
- 471 cc (Bore x stroke: 67 x 66.8 mm)
- 48 ch (47.30 hp) to 8,500 rpm
- 4.40 mkg to 7,000 rpm
- Power-to-weight ratio : approximately 3.81 kg/ch
- Weight / torque ratio : approximately 40.94 kg/mkg
- Compression : 10.7 : 1
- Standard equipment
- Brake assist : ABS as standard
Gallery
Models
2015
2014
2013
helmet
Gloves
jacket
braking
Chain kit
Oils
Parts
Luggage
Tires
Bikers' reviews Leave a review - 18 reviews
I've just signed the order form, I'll give you an update after a few thousand KM.
Looking forward to seeing you on the road Rating : 5/5 Respond to MarcoX65X
Rating : 4/5 Participate in the conversation
Personally, I took the gray one; very pretty, but that's a matter of taste:)
As for the end of production, I'm not in the know, but I'm surprised since the model was released in 2013...
See you soon :p Rating : 5/5 Participate in the conversation
I've clocked up just under 5500km on it, riding style: 80% mountain pass roads, twisties, arsouille, 20% solo or duo rides.
I ride with friends on typical models: 1199 panigale, 1000 gsxr, R6, R1, ZX6R, FZ1.
My Plus :
- cycle part : it's a real bike, it goes everywhere and for fun I put it on the licence plate with my old instructor to test it and surprise less difficulty, more reactivity and better time on slow and fast courses against ER6Ns and a CB500 from 2013 as well
- looks: Honda has pulled out all the stops to bring out a superb model that has nothing to be ashamed of when compared to larger-displacement models, and which raises a lot of questions.
- ABS: when it comes to safety, the standard ABS is a big YES! You've got to love it, but it saved my butt on two occasions during emergency braking where the road was cut off...
- powertrain: well, not everything's top-notch, but the positive points are the twin-cylinder, which provides very good torque and a very pleasant sound (an Ixil Racer muffler with no baffle for my part), and which allows you to send the engine into a spin or maintain the throttle in cruising mode, as well as the very appreciable throttle hold in curves.
- fuel consumption: 5.2L average when cruising with hyper sports!
My Minuses :
- Finishing: some of the fairing assembly leaves something to be desired as time goes by (and vibrations), the defects become more noticeable, especially on the bubble.
- vibrations: after 110km/h, I complain of a vibration in the footrests and on the sds seat, and the same when you're at 7000rpm.
- Riding: it's all relative, as I'm still on original Dunlop sportmax d222 160s. They're very easy to ride, but as soon as you hit the mountain passes (Lagrasse - 11 and St Pons - 34, for example), they quickly show their limits
- Engine: that's the black spot for me, it's sorely lacking in peachiness, especially when overtaking! a guy in a car (2.0L for example) who accelerates when you overtake him really puts you in difficulty ... as witnessed by my mates who were behind in 2nd gear and I was in 3rd gear to overtake (rowing rather ^^).
I hope this helps some people in their choice :D but on the whole I'm very happy with it!
OVERVIEW :
Braking: 4/5
Motorization: 3.5/5
Looks: 4.5/5
Comfort : 4/5
Fuel consumption: 5/5
Cycle : 5/5
Opinion : here is my next bike in a few months Honda CBR600RR :)
V to all and be careful on the road ;)
Rating : 4/5 Respond to Benoit du 11
A2 licence in pocket.
I've only just given it an Akrapovic stainless steel carbon tip exhaust; belatedly, as I've just decided I'll keep it even after validating the A license.
My use:
80% commuting in all conditions (20% regional - 60% expressways - 20% city)
15% for leisurely strolls with my sandbag in the back
5% riding around with friends who aren't too well-built :)
Its assets:
-Very economical
.4.4L without paying attention,
.affordable servicing every 12,000 km instead of 6,000
.I've only just changed my first rear tire because of the lack of power...
-Looks (turns heads and asks questions at stoplights!)
-Efficient and perfectly balanced chassis (it doesn't weigh 200kgs)
-Pleasant, available, linear engine (quality in my opinion, given the target market)
-The price! Brand new at 4990â'¬ for me (a stroke of luck though)
-The range, with its interesting fuel tank given its fuel consumption
-The very pleasant, natural riding position
-The fairing, which although imperfect, still does the job well enough to avoid the inconveniences of a high-speed roadster
-The finesse of the overall package, which is much appreciated
Downsides:
-Vibrations very present from 6,000 rpm, especially for the female passenger
-Cap not attached to fuel tank (I'm still struggling to place it where I can)
-Saddle a little hard on long rides (but no problem on daily commutes)
-The inaudible sound of the original muffler, which poses a problem in summer traffic to warn tourists of its arrival
All in all, I don't think I could have chosen a better bike for my first ride. What made me choose the original:
-Price (in my case, great opportunity)
-Looks
-The promised fuel consumption (not kept, but quite reasonable nonetheless)
-The long service intervals (which don't prevent regular checks!)
Hopefully this will help future lovers of the beauty, even prettier for my taste in her 2014 dress :)
Arthur
Rating : 5/5 Respond to Kubes
Assessment:
Engine: linear. Some don't like it, others like it. I'll talk about power once the break-in is over. For the moment, I'm not going above 6,000 rpm, but I didn't run out of power in acceleration or recovery, even at 130. So OK.
Consumption:
The claimed consumption of 3.7l is illusory. I'm just breaking in, so I consume more, but still. I'm betting on a 4/4.5L with a 33% city/dep/national mix. It's still low.
Comfort:
After 2 hours, I'm feeling my buttocks. Wind protection is effective up to 90. At 130, you have to hold on to the handlebars :).
Look: I love it.
Insurance: 300 euros less than an XJ6.
What I like most about my bike :
. making up for my beginner's mistakes
. the abs that have already saved me a bowl in town
. its finesse
. its measurable power, which is totally sufficient to comply with the Highway Code.
. and above all, the dashboard (it's bo ^^).
Rating : 4/5 Respond to girouette
Hi, how much insurance do you pay? Are you A2? Comprehensive? Rating : 4/5 Participate in the conversation
*the least good thing is the noise of the dangerous pots... Average original bubble protection.relaunching on freeways.
Verdict for someone who drives a lot but doesn't want to spend too much on maintenance, look no further.
I'm more in favor of the HONDA CBR500R
because the cylinder is stronger, so there's less risk of damage in the long term.
Rating : 4/5 Respond to max
Didierr, if you want an engine as nice as the old CB500..well, the new one is more muffled...
D\'accord avec René à part le tarif.
Pascale59...make 1 effort to understand the sentences, I have nothing against beginners but against aseptic marketing. We'll be surprised at the decline of the largest displacements in the evolution of the market...
Julien147, my job requires me to ride this distance regularly, 4 or 5 times a week, and it's not with a 500 that I'd do it (I've already ridden the old CB500, which was nice but the engine was too small).
At this price, it's very close to the nice ER6N, CBF600 (although it's finished), Gladius (the current limited series is nice). At just over 1000â'¬ on top of that, the Hornet is welcoming for all levels. Ah yes, but we're talking A2...dream on.
Rating : 1/5 Respond to Daniel
This bike may be "marketing", but I like it and I'm happy to ride the CBR500 even with my A licence. Rating : 4/5 Participate in the conversation
I just wanted to react to Daniel's last post, which I don't think was very objective.
Dear Daniel, first of all, just because you do 200Km doesn't mean you have to do it with a 100hp bike. And above all, it doesn't make your comments any more valuable than those of others. It's in no way a valid argument (otherwise a large number of car drivers would have a Porsche). Then, as far as marketing is concerned, I think you're simply forgetting that there are many types of motorcycle because there are many types of rider. Honda seems to have understood this....
... have a good ride anyway :-)
Signed: another guy with an A licence riding a CBR500... Rating : 5/5 Participate in the conversation
For example, I got my motorcycle licence in 2010 (although I don't have a car licence, which works to my disadvantage), and the only motorcycle I was able to insure was a Bandit 400 which, for the record, was discontinued in '95! It seems to me, rather, that this is judicious marketing, opening up the market and giving young licence holders the chance to ride a healthy bike rather than a wreck!
Right now, I've got a zxr400 (from '97) and I've got to wait another 2 years to switch to a 600, which is a long time!
A quick question for everyone: is this 500cc flanged at 46hp, or was it designed for 46?
But why don't they remake the zxr400? With its 70 hp... Snif! :D
Rating : 5/5 Participate in the conversation
Did I write that it's bullshit to make motorcycles of all sizes?
Did I say that you need a powerful bike to ride (even a 103 for touring can be fun)?
I've already said it all, and the figures on the evolution of the motorcycle market confirm it.
Bonne route.
Rating : 2/5 Participate in the conversation
I've just ordered my CBR500 and I've also got an A licence. I could have gone for more power, but this bike is perfect for doing everything and getting back on two wheels after a long abstinence. Rating : 5/5 Participate in the conversation
I say bravo HONDA, and the main thing is that there's something for everyone. Rating : 4/5 Respond to Maryse
First of all, an old ER5 works better than these sanitized machines, ER5, CB500, ah another era of value when the "living" engine had better definition...
To put it simply... normal is a Honda.
A sporty motorcycle without being too sporty, it's not unless you prepare it...ah but yes, it's more expensive than the higher displacements...
In my memory, I had a 2001 Fazer 600, and it did the job nicely in all revs, with superb fuel consumption...ah but yes, there aren't only 4-cylinders...
So a Kawa ER6 (6499â'¬), Gladius (5599â'¬), Bandit (5499â'¬)... Honestly, really, gleaning a lively 650 twin-cylinder for 1 placid 4-pot muzzled to the core, if that isn't sanitizing... just like these licenses...
This CBR500R-igolote..in short, it's low on fuel consumption
in terms of performance, it's really limited, given the torque/power indicated. On the sport side, it only looks good. That's all.
To sum up: this nice-looking motorcycle is a marketing ploy for new drivers or just new drivers... it's economical, does the job of a 2 and a half, comfortable etc... but on the price front, there's something better and more lively to enjoy. In short, it's a dilemma (to put it politely) between a 250 and real intermediate-displacement bikes
For the curious: biker on a Triumph Sprint, riding 200 km/day in winding roads. Motorcycle experience: 10 years. My debut? on a Seven fifty.
In short for julien47,
Rating : 1/5 Respond to Daniel
Very good boiler, smooth and linear in the rise in regime but amusing beyond 6000rpm.
Daniel, you obviously haven't tried it.
it's a very good chassis, very playful, extremely forgiving, immediately gives you confidence and it holds up well. relatively comfortable, but due to its thinness, less pleasant than a Fazer 1 ere generation (which I also had, my dear Daniel) or a Bandit 600/650 (my last 2 exes), fitted with correct original tires, but nothing more. protection... ineffective if you air your ears well! the keel is a pain, you have to put your foot between the footrest and the selector to unfold it... a drama. Mon cher Daniel, c\'est incroyable 200Km par jour quel homme, tous les jours dans le sineux... ça me rappelle ma jeunesse dans l\'arriere pays varois! i do about 30 a day, plus a weekend now and then on a gentle ride (next to an NC700X, a TRIUMPH 800XC and an FZ8), and I'm not lying ;-). a very good choice for those who don't need to compensate with a "big" bike, I repeat. For the price, there's nothing better, Daniel, a 15-year-old bandit (I know a lot about bandits, the latest ones are rubbish), a gladius is fine, but it's a bargain bike that will go downhill very quickly, or... the antediluvian Fazer 600, undoubtedly the best bike, but ultra-mileage and/or out of condition... Let's be clear. Thank you Honda for going back to basics, with a nice face and overall quality that meets the brand's standards, despite the fact that it's made in Thailand. Rating : 4/5 Participate in the conversation
It provides absolutely everything an A2 needs, with no pretensions or shortcomings. Rating : 4/5 Participate in the conversation
\"Sporting representative of the A2 license", l\'absurdity is said... Rating : 1/5 Respond to Daniel
Very nice bike for a beginner, powerful and affordable enough for a young licence holder and responsible rider, not for dangerous show-offs. Rating : 5/5 Participate in the conversation
If you read motos motards magazine (from June, I think!?) or see comparo on http://www.moto-station.com/article16490-honda-cbr-500-r-vs-kawasaki-ninja-300-mini-fight-club.html, the cbr puts a slap in the ninja's face. Of course, their power-to-weight ratio is pretty close, and yes, the ninja's mill is smaller.
And then there's Honda's attempt to reach a wide audience with versatile, top-of-the-range bikes. And everyone's personality is different, so you need bikes that appeal to everyone. The main thing is the pleasure you get from your bike.
Bonne route Rating : 5/5 Participate in the conversation