Motorcycle specifications Suzuki750 GSX-R 1998 A smoother pistarde


presentation of the 750 GSX-R 1998
what looks more like a GSX-R than another GSX-R? Answer: the new 750, where the only small visible difference suggests a very different bike. No, I'm not talking about the carbon-imitation trim around the speedometers. The bubble? Sure, it's 3 cm higher, but that's not it either. Look further down, on the sides of the fairing... Yes, it's that little 'Electronic Fuel Injection' sticker - the new-generation Suzuki GSX-R 750 has fuel injection. And also a steering damper (standard) and thicker brake discs. But don't worry, it hasn't put on weight. Dry weight remains at 179 kg, while power output continues to increase. At full power, the boiler has gained 7 hp, enabling it to deliver a respectable 135 hp.
But it's not all plain sailing for the queen of sports bikes. The danger comes from Yamaha, and the arguments hurt. Almost identical weight and 150 hp for the earth-shattering YZF R1. But if you think that impresses the Gex...
on first contact, we find the same sports bike as last year. The riding position hasn't changed a bit, and remains as physical as ever. The GSX-R is a compact bike, tiring in town, with a tank that spreads your legs and half-handlebars that break your wrists. In short, a circuit machine. Protection is of a much better vintage, as the raised bubble means you can cruise at over 180mph without fighting turbulence.
Where the Suzuki is easier to live with than its predecessor is in terms of engine behavior. Fuel injection has softened the 4-cylinder beast without sacrificing performance. Electronic management is very similar to that of the 1000 TLS, and relies on a host of parameters. The module can also detect certain engine failures. While not a major factor in boiler power, fuel injection greatly improves mill smoothness, eliminates the hiccups that were a bit annoying on the old GSX-R, and offers better throttle response. The gearbox is also smoother. That's good, because you still have to play with the selector to get the most out of the 7.5.
A block of this displacement can never be as full as a 1000, let's face it. The Suzuki mill responds to this argument with increased progressiveness and a racing temperament with an ounce of savoir-vivre. It responds nicely at low revs, then waits for the 4500-7000 rpm zone to make its presence felt. After that, you'll find the watts to take the bike seriously all the way up to 10,000 rpm, where the big herd of nags will come pouring in. There's plenty of potato, but none of the violence of the old carburettor system. Temperamental enthusiasts will be disappointed that the GSX-R has put some water in its wine. Time-hunters, on the other hand, will appreciate a more available and controllable engine. But don't go screwing like an idiot out of a corner. The Gex 98 allows you to accelerate earlier and harder, and the power is well transmitted to the ground, but don't go beyond what the rear end can give you. Finally, before putting on the beret, you've got to want it bad.
Still sovereign on the track, the 750 has lost some of its agility. The steering damper makes itself felt a little at low speeds, the profile of the original tires lacks incisiveness, and in the end, the rider will have to bring the machine onto its trajectory with more conviction. Once it's there, it won't budge. On open roads, the tires and steering damper make the bike safer but less lively. However, we're glad that this little shock absorber (hidden under the lower fork crown) calms down the front end when the Suzuki strides over rough terrain. Don't like bumps? The GSX-R calms them. Take advantage of this calm to learn how to handle the bike's brakes. It's not much, but you'll miss the bite. On the racetrack, it's not great, as you really have to insist on the lever to take advantage of the power of the 6-piston Tokico calipers. On French departmental roads, this less incisive braking may represent a safety margin.
Interestingly, although the GSX-R 750 has improved considerably, its price increase remains reasonable. Between the vibrators, the competition becomes tougher, more formidable, even unfair... But Suzuki is not about to pull in its claws.
M.B
(inspired by Moto-journal - manufacturer's photos)
Key facts Suzuki 750 GSX-R (1998) : What you need to know before you buy
Highlights
- Efficiency
- Steering damper
- Availability and engine flexibility
Weak points
- Less character
- Lack of brake bite
- Less agile
Prices
Basic version | |
---|---|
![]() |
9,900€
|
Performance
- Max speed : 265 km/h (164.70 mph)
- 0-100 km/h acceleration : 3.20 s
Specifications Suzuki 750 GSX-R 1998
- Chassis
- Frame : Double aluminum perimeter beam
- Fuel capacity : 18 liters (4.76 US gallons)
- Seat height : 830 mm (32.68 in)
- Length : 2,055 mm (80.91 in)
- Width : 720 mm (28.35 in)
- Min height : 1,135 mm (44.69 in)
- Wheelbase : 1,395 mm (54.92 in)
- Dry weight : 179 kg (395 lb)
- Front axle
- Reverse telehydraulic fork Ø 43 mm, Wheel travel : 120 mm (4.72 in)
- Braking 2 discs Ø 320 mm (12.6 in), caliper 6 pistons
- Front tire : 120 / 70 - 17 → Order this type of tire
- Transmission
- 6 stage gearbox
- Secondary by chain
- Rear axle
- Mono-damper, Wheel travel : 133 mm (5.24 in)
- Braking 1 disc Ø 220 mm (8.66 in), 2-piston caliper
- Rear tire : 190 / 50 - 17 → Order this type of tire
- Motor
- 4 cylinders online , 4 strokes
- Injection Ø 46 mm
- Cooling system : liquid
- 2 ACT
- 4 valves per cylinder
- 749 cc (Bore x stroke: 72 x 46 mm)
- 135 ch (133.10 hp) to 12,300 rpm
- 8.40 mkg to 10,300 rpm
- Power-to-weight ratio : 1.34 kg/ch
- Weight / torque ratio : 21.31 kg/mkg
- Compression : 12 : 1
Bikers' reviews Leave a review - 12 reviews
The chassis is clearly very good... the engine is more of a big 600 than a small 1000, but it still performs well and drives well... the noise is magnificent... In short, a good wheel that's not too expensive, that still has a lot of charm and gives good sensations when properly shod... Rating : 5/5 Respond to Gazorus
Rating : 4/5 Respond to mike
Engine: Between two waters. It pushes so hard you'll lose your license. The displacement is more reminiscent of a 600, but with more punch. We miss the 96 carburetor, but with a dozen extra ponies and more flexibility, the injection system is seductive. The first gear, a little dry, obviously gets the front end off the ground, as does the second. The following gears, when revved from 7000rpm, provide almost the same sensations as a 1000cc, with the only regret being a lack of linearity.
Tested in 2012, i.e. 14 years after its launch, the bike has just under 30,000 km on the clock (quite rare for this machine) and the gearbox and clutch, although original, are reminiscent of a new bike, with precise, "perfect" controls.
If it easily approaches 300km/h, in a straight line you'll feel a few sensations from 170km/h, and even if you start from the principle that faster is always more vibrant, there's no need, the lengthening of the fourth and the late passage of the fifth are already addictive, the sixth, as with many machines, is only present to relieve the soul of this bike (and incidentally titillate the TGV).
Chassis: On our test bike, there was no steering damper â€" except on tracks or rough roads, where there's no need! The frame (Diamond) is sufficiently rigid to absorb angle changes and give the impression of a rail â€" possibly due to the machine's weight/embossment/hunting angle â€" the SRAD will only default if abused, but be careful not to overdo it, as it doesn't really prevent…
Six-piston front calipers and 43mm inverted fork (unlike its little sister) provide sure-footed, powerful braking, as long as you press the lever despite the six pistons, and enough to build up forearm muscle provided you're properly shod (forget the original Metz**** mount).
As for the shock absorber, it doesn't necessarily need adjusting for lambda use, and the weight (approx. 179kg dry) remains relatively reasonable in view of its imposing fairings.
Although the arrival of fuel injection has displeased many, and despite an engine that's a little hollow up to 6,500rpm, this machine has a playful, nippy character, a decent range on the road ( /- 180km before reserve for an 18L tank), and excellent protection.
190 rear tire to be upgraded to 180, a few vibrations at mid-range, but enough room under the passenger seat to make today's GTs envious, and above all a look that's rather criticized for its size, but still highly sought-after even in 2012! Rating : 3/5 Respond to userhosted
i am currently looking for a certificate of conformity for a 1998 Suzuki GSX-R, does anyone have one...???
Or a paper or certificate concerning noise and exhaust fumes??? Rating : 3/5 Respond to stephane
9th year riding this bike (GSX-R750 1999) winter/summer. Nearing 70,000 km, it's running great! Never had any problems with it, apart from a plastic thing in the fork that I changed 2 times (no big deal)
As you say, Kaio.shin, this bike requires a certain dexterity... to get the best out of it. For a few years now, I've been gumming it with Michelin PILOTE ROAD & ROAD 2 tires. In short, they're less sticky than the Pilot Power 2CT, but they have the advantage of rolling for a long, long time..
Have a good ride! Switzerland, March 11, 2009 Rating : 5/5 Respond to Ziz
Even for my 1.94 m... i feel comfortable on it...the spoilers aren't broken, and my back and buttocks don't hurt...
the fact remains that it's a hardcore sports bike (so not an easy one, or one for beginners) ... but one that's still usable on a daily basis..
much more so than an R1, for example ... Rating : 5/5 Respond to kaio.shin
i've been riding this bike every day for 2 years now, I've never had a backache, I don't walk like a canard, on the contrary, I haven't yet found a bike on which I feel as good, the seat is great while leaving enough freedom to wiggle like on a racetrack ;)
In town, it gets a bit hot in summer, but otherwise nothing to complain about, and 700-mile rides are a breeze, with no need for professional masseuses on arrival
My model is a bit earlier than these, dating from '96, it's not listed on this site, it's the same bike, with one more carburettor and less electronics. Rating : 5/5 Respond to Zepur